|
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic
|  |
tromboner
Grasshopper
|
If the U.S. does end up losing the Iraq war, it will be be for exactly the same reasons that we lost in Vietnam. In Vietnam, U.S. troops were stationed in firebases out in the middle of nowhere and only went into the villages about once a month. Therefore, the VC just left when the Americans were coming and came back when we left. In Iraq, for the longest time, our troops spent most of their time in "forward operating bases," from which they launched occasional patrols. Sound familiar? However, since the "surge," U.S. forces have been stationed out in the worst neighborhoods where they are always there to watch out for terrorists. However, they only have enough troops to do this in Baghdad and Anbar, so the terrorists will just move elsewhere. We'd need about 250,000 troops to secure Iraq, but the Democrats would never let us expand the military to the point where we could do that. So, until then, all we can do is cross our fingers and use what we've got.
|
|
|
peepee
Dairy Product Addict
|
Quote: from aaron13 at 7:10 am on April 6, 2007
Quote: from Pax Anarchia at 3:04 am on Nov. 26, 2006
Quote: from Das Uberdog at 3:40 am on Nov. 26, 2006
Quote: from Libertarian Samurai at 6:37 am on Nov. 26, 2006
It's what we get for playing nice. 
Playing nice?!? You mean, having a government which is sort of accountable to the public every four years and an electorate which isn't completely and utterly brain-dead and masochistic? You're a sick fuck dipshit. 
NO, NO, NO, by playing nice, he means not carpetbombing the shit out of sand niggers who think the Americans are fucking gay. Oh, and as for Vietnam, YOU STILL FUCKING LOST, quit making up excuses. 
You should watch your mouth; it would take us all of 3 days to take over Canada lol. 
LOL cocky Americans. Wasn't this the idea with Iraq? America COULD NOT take over Canada. Not unless it nuked us and then America would get Nuked and everyone would be fucked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
boy4boy15
Dairy Product Addict
|
this post is obviously biased and an insult to many of our soldiers getting blown up daily in iraq, so why is it stickied?
|
|
|
GGauthier
Personal Assistant
|
People stopped believing this after Vietnam and Korea.
|
|
|
|
|
boothy
Enlightened One
Patron
|
Come you masters of war You that build all the guns You that build the death planes You that build the big bombs You that hide behind walls You that hide behind desks I just want you to know I can see through your masks You that never done nothin' But build to destroy You play with my world Like it's your little toy You put a gun in my hand And you hide from my eyes And you turn and run farther When the fast bullets fly Like Judas of old You lie and deceive A world war can be won You want me to believe But I see through your eyes And I see through your brain Like I see through the water That runs down my drain You fasten the triggers For the others to fire Then you set back and watch When the death count gets higher You hide in your mansion As young people's blood Flows out of their bodies And is buried in the mud You've thrown the worst fear That can ever be hurled Fear to bring children Into the world For threatening my baby Unborn and unnamed You ain't worth the blood That runs in your veins How much do I know To talk out of turn You might say that I'm young You might say I'm unlearned But there's one thing I know Though I'm younger than you Even Jesus would never Forgive what you do Let me ask you one question Is your money that good Will it buy you forgiveness Do you think that it could I think you will find When your death takes its toll All the money you made Will never buy back your soul And I hope that you die And your death'll come soon I will follow your casket In the pale afternoon And I'll watch while you're lowered Down to your deathbed And I'll stand o'er your grave 'Til I'm sure that you're dead
------- "reclaiming public spaces as a space for public imagination and enlightenment where they have become propagandistic barriers to thought and awareness"
|
2:08 pm on Aug. 14, 2007 | Joined July 2006 | 335 Days Active Join to learn more about boothy England, United Kingdom | Straight Male | 10848 Posts | 14565 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
AnUbscuredAbsence
Advisor
|
ya,we are all going to die,but on a happier note gorge bush is only president for half a year,and then we have another president hopefully smarter,the likely hood of that not so much........
|
|
|
Vixenized
Dairy Product Addict
|
RANT TIME! As pointed out before, the American 'war-machine' is more than capable of completely iradicating the threat, thus the strength of its own militant power is to be revered. However the myth itself of its indestructability has been tested in this feild and broken, because psychological warefare IS an important component in all warfare strategies, especially since this is concerning Guerilla warfare, a strategy not highly understood by the Super Power. Face it ladies and gentlemen, Guerilla Warfare has been well deployed in the last half of the century and well off into the new, from the Apartheid Era to Veitnam itself. Its also been proven to be highly effective against armed forces, though is governing nature is far to ambiguous to stabilize itself as a form of government on most cases (Anarchsist handiwork). Even if one bombs a supposed headquarters of terrorists one still cant ever be sure they have beaten them. And Guerilla warfare wins its battles not by the old "My horse is bigger than your horse" idea, rather by 'outsmarting its enemies and atacking it to its core of operations'. Compared to the past where millions of men where just simply sent to their deaths, paying the bill of war in how much blood was spilt. If American hopes to win this war totally, it needs to root out the radical factions within it, and pacify any instability in its social relations with the people. The American occupation does face a major threat from the infrastructure of the country itself, since it has been on some cases represented in a critical point of view by the media, and mainly it lacks the sufficient intelligence to understand the processes about the functions of their oponents, and their failure in dealing with Radical propaganda with effective political diplomacy. Then again, was this war ever about Diplomacy? Is it simply, as others have said, a bid to gain wealth and valuable resources? Maybe so, politics does look for personal gain before entering a war, but the main ideology is that American is protecting her national security and her national pride, which is acceptable and understandable since terrorism does indeed exsist with malicious purposes against the western world. Besides, one could say the occupying forces are trying to change some legal customs of their culture by force-an action which is garanteed to infuriate the communities and give social power to the radical factions. I agree that some of the practises in Iraq are questionable and bordering inhumane cruelty, but people dont simply CHANGE because you want them too. Diplomacy is more effective that nukes and gunfure. let the people decide they WANT the change; which in respect the american presence in its country is atempting to help it when there arent bombs and body bits flying everywhere.
|
|
|
Iblis
Personal Assistant
|
Just joining this discussion and, frankly, not caring to read over the past six pages as half-illiterate posts and make a response to only those that displayed some measure of intellectual aptitude: No. No myth was destroyed. We spent the past sixty years building up for a conventional war of the most apocalyptic scale. Keyword: Conventional. We're stilling faring far better than our past-equal, the Russians, in Afghanistan. This is like bitching that your G5 Mac, which kicks ass at video-processing and graphics-design, can't play Bioshock.
------- If there were no God, it would become necessary to invent Him.
|
|
|
rcduggan
Be seeing you...
Patron
|
the myth hasn't been shattered. the united states military might is based in the cold war concept of a Total Conventional War.... not a small, localized insurgency
------- ...in the village. Or not. But have fun in life.
|
5:22 pm on Aug. 20, 2007 | Joined April 2007 | 309 Days Active Join to learn more about rcduggan Massachusetts, United States | Asexual Male | 23610 Posts | 30726 Points
|
|
| |
|
|
perpetually annoyed
Executive
|
We are not winning, but we're not losing either.
------- I am hopeful that this is helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
derbyshirebandit
Advisor
|
Don't you think that the real flaw in this whole situation is that nether side is morally right? The Americans have killed people who had no involvement in the conflict and violated human rights in G bay. The CIA also put Saddam in power after the first gulf war. Saddam and his followers are responsible for mass murder and the suppression of the Iraqi people. The acts of genocide they have committed are not justified by the Koran even in its most literal form. Both sides have proven that they will violate there own ideology's in the pursuit of victory. The place that the battle was lost and won was not in the cities or the countryside, it was in the subconscious. The simple fact is that what is offered by radical Islam is more appealing than capitalism to the people of Iraq. Many people within the system have disliked the change to democracy simply because it was forced upon them were as they were born into the state as it was before. So to truly see if this war is a stalemate, we must wait to see if America's enemies have any better fortune in there war on western soil were the mindset of the populous is not so much in there favour. Post edited at 9:22 am on Nov. 26, 2007 by derbyshirebandit
------- To understand British swearing is to be one with the scouse.
|
|
|
|
| Looking for something else?
|
|
|
|
|
|
 | / / / Viewing Topic |  |
|